Chelsea's Board and Enzo Maresca Clash Amid Management and Future Concerns
Chelsea's board and Enzo Maresca clashed over how to run the club, signaling governance friction that culminated in Maresca's departure less than 24 hours into 2026. He attempted to engineer his exit as the club prepared to sack him. The tensions were evident when Maresca canceled or declined a post-match press conference after a 2-2 draw with Bournemouth, amid broader concerns over his future. He described experiencing his "worst 48 hours" and mentioned pursuing outside opportunities, increasing the sense of instability.
Maresca revealed he had spoken on three occasions with people connected to Manchester City about the possibility of replacing Pep Guardiola. Under his management, Chelsea's form slumped, with only one win in seven league games and 20 points dropped from winning positions across all competitions. There was growing criticism over his cautious, possession-based style.
Cracks in leadership widened further following Levi Colwill's knee injury and a demand for a new centre-back. Chelsea's structure emphasizes long contracts for youth players, with Behdad Eghbali being influential in those decisions. Maresca complained of interference from higher up. His rotation policy was a constant feature, including resting or managing injury-prone players, which led to boos when Palmer was substituted and concerns over James's heavy fixture load. Maresca also questioned the readiness of players like Andrey Santos.
Chelsea denied that tactics or recruitment decisions were dictated to Maresca. Upon his departure, talks began about a potential replacement, with Liam Rosenior linked as the next Chelsea manager.
