Controversy Over DOJ's Redacted Release of Epstein Files Under Transparency Act
The Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandates full disclosure of all Epstein-related investigative files by December 19 with only limited redactions allowed to protect ongoing investigations, national security, or identify victims, has become the center of a legal and political dispute.
On Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) released a large yet heavily redacted trove of files related to Jeffrey Epstein. Critics argue that this release violates the act’s requirements and undermines its spirit.
Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Thomas Massie (R-KY), co-authors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, have expressed strong dissatisfaction with the DOJ’s approach, stating the release does not meet the law’s intent or stipulations. They are exploring options such as impeachment proceedings and contempt of Congress.
Todd Blanche, former criminal-defense lawyer for Donald Trump and currently deputy attorney general, stated that hundreds of thousands of documents would be released with additional batches expected in the coming weeks, emphasizing the importance of protecting victims through redactions.
House Democrats, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have criticized the partial release, calling for full disclosure and demanding the resignation of former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, citing a cover-up of significant details.
Representatives Robert Garcia and Jamie Raskin issued a joint statement accusing the DOJ of violating federal law and covering up critical aspects of Epstein’s case. They are examining all legal options and urging immediate release of all files.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer echoed these concerns, stating that the DOJ’s release violates both the spirit and letter of the law, pledging that Democrats will pursue actions to hold the administration accountable.
In response, the DOJ defended its partial release on the social media platform X, asserting compliance with the law and noting that no Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) were redacted. The DOJ also confirmed that materials related to former President Bill Clinton were disclosed, though Clinton has denied any wrongdoing connected to Epstein.
