Europe Should Pursue a Non-Nuclear Security Model Instead of a NATO-Plus Architecture
Europe faces a critical choice in its security architecture, with calls against building a European-led 'house of dynamite' or a standalone NATO-plus structure. Instead, experts advocate for a radical, non-nuclear security model based on deterrence-by-denial and resilient-resistance involving whole-society participation. This approach aims to avoid reliance on nuclear deterrence or offensive military capabilities, focusing on long-term human security rather than short-term military superiority.
The envisioned security model draws inspiration from neutral countries such as Austria, Ireland, and Switzerland as well as from UN and Nordic human-security frameworks. This reflects a broader questioning of whether European societies possess the wisdom needed to prioritize sustainable peace and human security over expanding military strength.
The article also addresses EU-Russia relations, noting Russia's opposition to Ukraine joining NATO but relative openness toward Ukraine joining the EU. It proposes considering a neutral Ukraine as a strategy to improve ties between the EU and Russia. The discussion includes a dissident perspective from figures like John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs, who argue that US-led NATO expansion contributed significantly to the Ukraine crisis. In light of this, there is a call to rethink the EU’s security posture and to pursue greater European strategic autonomy.
An alliance of European nations to support Ukraine and manage challenges posed by figures like former US President Trump is suggested, especially through mechanisms such as the European Defence Fund. This includes accelerating European defence integration as part of strengthening the continent's security.
Moreover, with France and Germany reintroducing military service, the author suggests that other European countries should consider similar steps to reinforce overall security preparedness.
